• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Under Fire: The Blitz Diaries of a Volunteer Ambulance Driver

  • Amazon
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • YouTube
Naomi Clifford

Naomi Clifford

Books + Talks

  • Books
  • Talks
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

James Gillray’s Monstrosities of 1799 – Kensington Gardens (Part 1)

6 March 2018Naomi Clifford

For a recent landmark birthday some kind and generous friends clubbed together to give me a hand-coloured print by James Gillray. As you can imagine, I was – and am – utterly thrilled with it. It set me off on a bit of a mission to find out more about Gillray and Hannah Humphrey, the woman who published it and who provided a home for Gillray for much of his adult life.


James Gillray’s satirical prints are among the most biting, bitchy and cruel of the cartoons produced in the long 18th century. No one, whether humble or high-born, escaped his scorn. His work has been described as ‘corrosive acid poured relentlessly on mankind’1.

James Gillray, by Charles Turner, after James Gillray, mezzotint (circa 1800) © National Portrait Gallery, London

Born in 1756 or 1757 in Chelsea, where his Scottish soldier father was a pensioner, Gillray first trained as a letter engraver but was soon bored and went off with a band of strolling performers instead. On his return to London he enrolled at the Royal Academy, where he started to produce etched caricatures heavily influenced by Hogarth under several pseudonyms.

James Gillray, Paddy on horse-back (1779). © The Trustees of the British Museum.

Gillray’s first attributable etching, produced when he was in his early twenties, was Paddy on Horse-back (1779), which shows an uncouth Irishman seated backwards on a bull galloping across open country towards London (St. Paul’s is visible on the right) where he hopes to make his fortune. The print was published by William Humphrey, whose sister Hannah later inherited his business and continued to publish Gillray (more about her in Part 2).

Despite receiving a government pension, Gillray’s soul was not for sale – he targeted politicians of all stripes and, of course, the Royals, who provided plenty of inspiration. Although George III did not really ‘get’ the humour, his eldest son, the Prince of Wales, did and was sometimes deeply upset by it. He was known to have acquired in 1804, secretly, through a chosen third party, the copper plate of L’Assemblée Nationale purely in order to destroy it and halt further circulation. The portraits were, it appears, too near the knuckle.

James Gillray, L’Assemblée Nationale ; —or — Grand Co-operative Meeting at St. Ann’s Hill. — Respectfully Dedicated to the admirers of “A Broad-Bottom’s Administration.” (1804). A reception given by Charles James Fox and his wife (centre) for various groups and friends of the Prince of Wales (bisected on the far right), all opposed to the government. British Political Cartoon Collection (Library of Congress)

The print I was given is “Monstrosities” of 1799, shown below, a satire on the extremes of fashion. The print is all about titillation and cheap allure. The impressive gentleman on the right is thought by some sources to be Thomas Johnes (1748–1816), a gentleman farmer and M.P., of Hafod in Cardiganshire – which presents us with a problem.

James Gillray, Monstrosities of 1799. Scene Kensington Gardens, published by Hannah Humphrey © The Trustees of the British Museum

Johnes was cultured and kind and, if his commissioned portrait is anything to go by, not particularly vain or style-conscious. He was notable for his attempts to upgrade the estate he inherited and to transform the lives of his poverty-stricken tenants. There is nothing about the dandyish figure in Monstrosities, who sports ridiculous over-the-knee tasselled boots, fullsome sideburns, soaring shoulder pads and a boldly sexually declaratory expression, that screams Welsh farmer.2

Thomas Johnes of Hafod. Monochrome etching of a corpulent, rather rough looking country gentleman
Welsh gentleman farmer Thomas Johnes, who may or may not have been the model for the man on the right of Gillray’s etching.

 Further evidence of Johnes is in the note in the bottom left corner, asking us to consult the ‘Johnnesonian [sic] Dictionary Edition of 1799’. One possibility is that it is not Thomas Johnes who is referenced but some other member of the family. If anyone can solve the mystery, please get in touch.

The women’s attire is just as extreme as the men’s. The taller of the two in the foreground wears an over-sized ‘poke’ bonnet and her gauzy, translucent gown is, like her companion’s, obscenely revealing. She sports a cork rump (for more on these read All Things Georgian’s wonderful post False Rumps!) and they both have hair cut short in back with a long frizzed fringe.

Seven years after this print was published, Gillray’s eyesight began to fail and his output dropped. Depressed, he turned to drink. In 1811 he suffered a bout of severe mental illness and attempted suicide. Mrs Humphrey took care of him until he died in 1815, aged only 58. He was interred in St James’s churchyard in Piccadilly. His work was hugely influential. In 1818, Cruikshank produced the first of a series of satirical prints titled Monstrosities. His take on absurd contemporary fashions harked back to Gillray’s.

George Cruikshank, Monstrosities of 1818. British Cartoon Collection (Library of Congress)

Related posts

James Gillray – Part 2: Hannah Humphrey and the print shops of London

James Gillray, Monstrosities of Kensington Gardens, 1799. Published by Hannah Humphrey © The Trustees of the British Museum

James Gillray’s Monstrosities of 1799 – Kensington Gardens (Part 1)

Unvarnished truth? The unreliable autobiography of Mary Saxby

Sanditon Episode 7

Robert Newton, A Peep at the Parisot! (1796). The figures on the left are probably Shute Barrington, the Bishop of Durham, and the Duke of Queensberry.

Mademoiselle Parisot’s shocking pirouettes put London in a spin

Thomas Gainsborough (1750). Portrait of a Woman. (Girl with a Book Seated in a Park). Yale Center for British Art, , Paul Mellon Collection. Woman in blue 18th century gown sitting in the landscape holding a book on her lap

5 portraits of women reading


Update 27 July 2019

Caroline Compton has sent this interesting information about Johnes:

Thomas Johnes of Hafod was brought up at my family home, Croft Castle, Herefordshire, when his parents bought the castle in 1746 when the Croft family went bankrupt after the South Sea Bubble. The Johnes family already owned land in mid Wales. Johnes was a highly cultivated man translating French medieval chronicles and having them printed on his own private press. He was a benevolent caring landowner who wanted to improve the lot of his many tenant farmers.  His farms produced Parmesan cheese in the eighteenth century!

There is a popular book by Elizabeth Inglis-Jones with the title Peacocks in Paradise, first published by Faber in 1950 (republished in 2001 by Gomer) about Johnes, picturesque landscape and his attempts to bring paradise to that part of Wales. He planted three million trees on his estate… His legacy (although much of it ruined by the Forestry Commission) is being brought back to his intentions by the Hafod Trust. 

Thomas Johnes bore no resemblance to his portrayal by Gillray: he was rotund, not tall and slender. Croft Castle now owned by the National Trust, has the full set of prints of the landscape after the original pictures by John ‘Warwick’ Smith which my mother gave to the trust. 


Update 2 May 2025

I highly recommend Alice Loxton’s 2023 book Uproar! : Satire, Scandal and Printmakers in Georgian London (Icon Books) – it’s an absolute tour de force and opens up the world of satirists and print publishers in a way I’ve not seen before.

  1. Frédéric Ogée, James Gillray, London. The Burlington Magazine, Vol 143, No 1183 (Oct. 2001), pp. 644–645.
  2. R. J. Moore-Colyer described Johnes as ‘an exceptionally cultured squire’ in his 1992 A Land of Pure Delight: Selections from the Letters of Thomas Johnes of Hafod, Cardiganshire, 1748-1816. Lladysul: Gomer Press.

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Titillation and contempt: the meaning of 18th-century caricatures of female fashion - Naomi Clifford says:
    2 May 2025 at 1:45pm

    […] previously posted on Monstrosities of 1799 by James Gillray, I thought I would return to the subject of fashion, but this time looking […]

    Reply
  2. Naomi Clifford | James Gillray - Part 2 says:
    2 May 2025 at 4:26pm

    […] my previous post on James Gillray, I looked at “Monstrosities” of 1799 – Kensington Gardens, a […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Footer


historical writers association logo



Useful resources

  • Image Databases
  • Maps and Gazetteers

Copyright © 2025 Naomi Clifford | Privacy policy